Police Investigate Glastonbury Performances by Bob Vylan and Kneecap Over Controversial Chants

Police have launched a criminal investigation into the Glastonbury Festival performances of British punk-rap duo Bob Vylan and Irish rap group Kneecap, following controversial statements made on stage. The move comes after footage from the event captured chants including “Death, death to the IDF” and calls to “start a riot,” which sparked public outcry and prompted authorities to assess whether any criminal offenses had occurred.

The investigation, led by Avon and Somerset Police, was initiated after a flood of complaints from the public and scrutiny from political figures and media regulators. Officers are now reviewing video and audio recordings of the performances to determine whether the artists violated public order laws or engaged in speech that could be considered incitement to violence or hate. The police force has emphasized that the inquiry will be evidence-based and impartial.

Bob Vylan’s set included pro-Palestinian chants that escalated in tone, drawing criticism not only for the message but also for the BBC’s decision to broadcast the performance live. Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy condemned the BBC’s coverage as unacceptable and called for answers about why the live feed was not cut. The broadcast regulator Ofcom is also reviewing whether the content breached editorial standards.

Kneecap’s performance was similarly charged, with political commentary that some interpreted as provocative. The group has previously been at the center of political controversy due to its outspoken views on British policy in Northern Ireland and support for causes such as Irish reunification and Palestinian solidarity.

Free speech advocates have raised concerns about the implications of criminal investigations into political or artistic expression, warning that such actions could set a troubling precedent for performers who use their platform to voice dissent. At the same time, others argue that public festivals should not be used to promote messages that may be construed as inciting violence or hatred.

The case highlights ongoing tensions around protest, artistic freedom, and public order in the UK. As police continue their investigation, the outcome may shape how authorities and the public navigate the boundaries of expression at high-profile cultural events.

DOWNLOAD IFPS